Author: Arthur

I was born in Kiev and have been living in Los Angeles for almost 25 years. I've been in IT pretty much since I was 13 and got my first computer. My specialties lie in the area of devops and web security, although I've pretty much done everything at one time or another.

Go Language

September 24, 2013 / / 0 Comments

It’s a relatively new language that came out of Google a few years ago. I’ve been playing around with it and trying to learn some of the basics. There some things that are very attractive about Go, not the least of which are the ability to get out of dependency hell and being able to distribute a single binary. Concurrency features are interesting as well.

Recently I came across a post from one of the Go authors and why he sees more people coming to go from Ruby & Python rather than C++, which is at least true for myself and it rings very true. No one ever wants to feel like things are being taken away from them. Not to pile on C++, especially since my experience with it is limited to a few intro courses in college (which were pretty bad and probably scared me away from it), but a few years ago, Linus also had a few choice words (as usual) about C++ as well.

Rich Hickey’s talk titled “Simple Made Easy” also has some relevance to this concept and I can’t help but think of this Exupery quote:

Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away

 

 

10x engineers

September 24, 2013 / / 0 Comments

Almost every company that I know is looking for engineers like this. Bad recruiters call them “rockstars” and “ninjas”. This article talks about some of the history and myths associated with the concept.

https://medium.com/about-work/6aedba30ecfe

I think they most certainly do exist in engineering and in other professions as well, though it may be the most explicit in engineering. But it is a pretty elusive concept which is not easily measured and it’s often used to justify really destructive behavior. I would classify someone as “10x” who is has enough depth and breadth to be able to make connections and see perspectives that others can’t. It’s not the efficiency of a specific algorithm or a productivity multiplier even though that might be a consequence. It’s the ability to see a problem in a different light and come up with a novel solution that results in improvements that are measured in orders of magnitude.

 P.S. This is also a relevant post by John Cook. 

http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/09/17/to-err-is-human-to-catch-an-error-shows-expertise/